I have had a pretty funny weekend. I wrote a very quick and dirty post about the changes Apple recently made to its update tool so that it it was just slightly less aggressive about installing their software on your computer. I woke up Sunday to find 8, all negative, comments!
I used a pretty crazy blog title (should have ended it with a ‘?’ in retrospect, just I didn’t predict any reaction), just because I had been on the receiving end of too many Mac Fanboys at dinner parties ruining my meal because I worked for an “Evil Monopolist”. I guess I hit a nerve!
I finished it pretty tongue in cheek, saying “Anyway, seems I still have the chip.”, which of course relates to my probable bias!
For the record, I still don’t believe Microsoft should have been convicted as a “monopolist” (you would be laughed at if you suggested an OS should ship without a browser today) though I do agree they had a number of overly aggressive business practices that did need to be curtailed, and have been. To this day they are held to a different standard than their competitors. They would certainly never get away with the behavior Apple has demonstrated here.
In fact I think the whole concept of a monopoly in IT is tricky. A great example of this is the Windows “N” product, the special edition of Windows, designed by the Europeans, which does not include Media Player and has sold as many copies as Microsoft Bob. I think it has had zero impact on the success of iTunes, with or without Media Player installed in the OS, it has become the most successful Media Player on consumer desktops today. Things just move too fast, and any Monopoly is transient, and becoming ever more transient.
Anyway, my point in the previous post was that the people defending Apple in this case are probably the first to criticize Microsoft and fail to see the tactic Apples employing as Monopolistic in nature. In this way they are holding their holier than thou company to different standards. This is dangerous.
Apple owns the iTunes/iPod franchise which dominates the music player and digital music markets with percentages Microsoft in its “Monopoly” days would have been proud of. In this case they are using the iTunes install base to increase their Safari install base. Its as simple as that.
For the record, they do have a monopoly class market share, from Wikipedia:
On September 12, 2006 Steve Jobs announced in his “It’s Showtime” keynote that Apple had 88% of the legal U.S. music download market
I’m sure it has gone backwards since then, but don’t take my word for it, search around yourself (or just look around at the colour of the headphone leads). But good on them, I bought a iPod Touch, I love it, but I hate iTunes and I will never shop at their store. That doesn’t mean I dont have to install it though, because they have chosen to make updates available only via that mechanism.
Anyway, only one of the commenter’s produced anything other than what I would expect from the Cult of Apple Think Samers. Just makes me laugh that the only other group that jumped on my comments after a post was the Scientologists. <grin>
Recent Comments